Re: [MO-java-dev] .NET Mock Objects?

[Jeff M. <je...@mk...>]

Personally I'd rather see dotnetmock move over here.

Not to try and subsume what you're doing but to try and keep the flow of
ideas between different implementations going.

It would be nice to present a united front rather than a whole series of
small loosely related projects.


On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 23:58, Griffin Caprio wrote:
> Sounds good.  I would like to keep the dynamic stuff and static stuff 
> together, also
> 
> Joe, would you like to move the module to the dotnetmock project on 
> sourceforge?
> 
> -Griffin
> 
> 
> >From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...>
> >To: "Griffin Caprio" 
> ><gri...@ho...>,<jo...@tr...>,<moc...@li...>
> >Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] .NET Mock Objects?
> >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 21:14:17 +0100
> >
> > > As for rolling in NMock stuff, I am thinking that would be a good thing 
> >as
> > > opposed to keeping it in the java implementation.  .NET developers might
> >not
> > > know it is there.
> > >
> > > Steve, Tim, or Philip, want to chime in as how to structure/organize 
> >these
> > > kinds of things?
> >
> >I'm increasingly convinced that we want to merge the two approaches and
> >would like to do the same in the Java world.
> >
> >As for separate or same project, I don't really mind. Joe started a module
> >here just to have somewhere to put it. He could move if he liked. The main
> >thing is to keep things cross-linked.
> >
> >S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Griffin Caprio
> cell: (773) 230-0936
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
-- 
Jeff Martin <je...@mk...>
mkodo