From: Steve F. <st...@m3...> - 2002-08-15 21:24:29
|
Agreed. That's why we called the first module 'mockobjects-java'. There was a start at a mock library for C# but I never heard anything more, does anyone know if it's still live? What I'm hearing is that some mock implementations may be harder in .Net because they use fewer interfaces in their frameworks than in Java. I may be wrong, I usually am (TM). That said, I believe that the most useful thing to port would be the expectation library which is the real heart of the project. I'd be curious to see how it differed in another language. Let's talk at the XTC. Steve - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Steve Freeman st...@m3... "Nonsense is just nonsense, but the study of nonsense is science." ----- Original Message ----- From: Vincent Massol To: tes...@ya... Cc: 'MockObjects' Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:28 PM Subject: RE: Mockobjects (Was: Re: [TDD] ANN: The Humble Dialog Box) Hi Darren, I think that is a great idea! I am participating (a little) to the mockobjects project and I know that the intent was not only Java. Actually we have planned for that since the beginning since we have put our java implementation in a mockobjects-java CVS module (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mockobjects/) , hopping for some other language implementation in the future . :-) The idea of the MockObjects project is twofold: 1/ Evangelize the concept of Mock Objects (language independent) and be a place where to find all information relevant to this subject (ok, there's still a lot of work to do .) 2/ Provide mock implementations for common APIs (in different languages) All this to say that if you are interested you would be very welcomed to join us and we would be very happy to start a mockobjects-cs CVS module (I'm speaking for myself but I am sure the others would be delighted as I am). I am ccing the mockobjects dev list. What do you think? Would you be interested in joining us? If you want to discuss this, please feel free to subscribe and send emails to the MockObjects development mailing list (http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=18189). If you want to do it on your own, that's very fine too and we would certainly cross-link your site. Thanks -Vincent -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hobbs [mailto:dwh...@sp...] Sent: 15 August 2002 20:04 To: tes...@ya... Subject: Mockobjects (Was: Re: [TDD] ANN: The Humble Dialog Box) I'm not promising anything (this will be my first foray into C#) but... I think I might have a go at porting Mockobjects and Mockmaker to .NET. Can't give any ETA as yet as it depends on the arrival of a new PC. Does anyone:- (a) Know if any other similar projects are underway so duplication is avoided. (b) Think it would be useful. Regards, -Darren On Wednesday 14 August 2002 09:16, Shaun Smith wrote: > > I am also using .Net. Have you found any way to more easily generate > > a mock object? Right now, I am hand typing in each method for a given > > interface that a mock object is implementing. Is there some way to at > > least generate blank methods/properties for each interface? > > This is something else that drives me mad about VS.Net. Plus the lack > of even the most basic refactoring support (rename method would be a > good start).... I find it crazy that you can't select a class and have > it create selected signatures for overriding methods. I honestly searched > for this facility for a couple of hours, but knowing that others can't > find it too makes me beleive it's not there. Oh well. Has anyone tried > any other IDE's for .Net development yet and make any recommendations? > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > tes...@ya... > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: tes...@ya... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: tes...@ya... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. |