From: Jeff M. <je...@mk...> - 2002-08-15 17:37:32
|
The Mock Objects project is still active, but has slowed. The reason for this is that it now seems to fill the requirements that most people have for it. New classes/methods are being added to it, but this is done as and when they are needed. Since we now have mocks for most of the commonly used classes there are few new methods being added. A release candidate for the next release was put up on sourceforge recently, but it's not been officially released (I've not had time). As far as I know no one has raised any issues with the code so it can be considered to be the next release. If you have any specific requirements for things to be added (e.g. CallableStatement) just let us know and we'll see what we can do. Although it's nice when people send in patches for things they need added. The web site is just one of those things that's been needing doing for a while but no one got around to it, and it's just now got broken. On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 17:57, Simon Levitt wrote: > Hello All, > > At WorldPay we are starting to define a rigid testing structure for our > Java code base. We've been investigating/using various methods in an > adhoc (mainly personal preference) manner for sometime, and now want to > standardise on one method and apply it across all our Java development. > > One of the options used, and one into which we're investigating is (of > course) the MockObjects project; Hence this Email. > > The missing contents of www.mockobjects.com and seemlingly (at least > partically) stagnent codebase has rung some alarm bells, but before > dismissing a potentially useful avenue (as it does alot of what we want) > I've been tasked with working out the status of the project. > > I apologise for not looking too deeply into mockobjects.sf.net, browsing > CVS to greatly, or reading the maillist archive very far back (I know why > mockobjects.com gives a 404 now BTW), all of which may to some degree > answer the following questions: > > Can someone give me an indication of the status of the project (ie. alive > and kicking, slightly dormant, dead, etc.)? CVS and/or the web-site > appear to have not been updated very much since May 2002. > > We're particularly interested in the use mock objects in the testing of > JDBC access - Are these classes being worked on by anybody? We have a > particular requirement for CallableStatement support for example. > > When we choose a testing strategy/technology, I do have a remit to be able > to work on said project and give the work I've done back to the project, > providing it benefits us to some degree (ie. in this case - enabling us > to test our code properly). Meaning both parties benefit. > > Thanks for your time, > > Simon., > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Simon Levitt, Senior Development Engineer @ WorldPay plc, > WorldPay Centre, The Science Park, Milton Rd., Cambridge, CB4 0WE, ENGLAND > Sim...@uk... Ph:+44(0)1223 715151 F:+44(0)1223 715157 > ------------------------- http://www.worldpay.com/ ----------------------- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r_______________________________________________ > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list > Moc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev -- jeff martin information technologist mkodo limited mobile: 44 (0) 78 5547 8331 phone: 44 (0) 20 2226 4545 email: je...@mk... www.mkodo.com |