From: <Vin...@ge...> - 2002-05-23 19:36:59
|
I don't know anything about the naming stuff, but you're welcome to send a patch to enhance the functionality of the mock. I think some guy somewhere will find the time to review it and apply it if it makes sense :-) Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: moc...@li... > [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf Of > mark mascolino > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:30 PM > To: moc...@li... > Subject: [MO-java-dev] MockAttributes > > > > Hello all, > > I am relatively new to the world of Mock Objects and have > come across your > implementation. I found a good reason to use the MockAttributes and > MockAttribute classes and found that the implementations are > a bit limiting. > For example MockAttributes' get(String name) method does not > use the name > parameter at all and returns the first item found in an > ArrayList. It also > removes that item from ArrayList. > > I was wondering if this limited implementation was intended > (based on some > Mock Object Philosophy that I am unaware of) or was just > choosen because it > got the job done quickly. If it was the latter, I think I might be > interested in providing patches if people would find them useful. > > thanks in advance... > mark > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list > Moc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev > |