From: Jeff M. <je...@mk...> - 2002-04-18 16:00:43
|
Happy to see anything that might be of use. On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 22:52, Trenton Lipscomb wrote: > I stumbled on MockObjects about a month ago, but it wasn't until recently that I had the R&D time to play around with it. I really like all the side effects that are gained by using MockObjects. Sure, it's a good way to test, but it really focus your testing on a particular section of code and makes sure that both sides of a given API know that the other expects. Very cool stuff. > > I had to add java.sql.CallableStatement (CS) support to the system, though. I only have it validating that the correct SP names are called. I don't have support for parameter matching (yet). But, it works insomuch as you can make sure a given set of SPs are called in a given order. It also supports creating more than one CS on the same MockConnection. > > Would anyone be interested in taking a look at that? Right now, my additions works well and are commented. I don't follow the MockObjects coding spec, partially because I didn't see it until today. > > *trenton > > ________________________________________ > Trenton Lipscomb CNET.com > Sr Software Engineer The source for > tre...@cn... computers and > 415-344-2275 technology. > > Does this email regard a patch to XDL? Read this! > http://nw-stage.cnet.com:8001/cgi-bin/fom.cgi?file=1418 > > _______________________________________________ > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list > Moc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev -- |