Re: [MO-java-dev] jms and servlet mocks

[Jeff M. <je...@cu...>]

On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 15:52, Steve Freeman wrote:
> From: "Jeff Martin" <je...@cu...>
> > I've completed adding my local changes to the source code. This mostly
> > consists of new classes in the servlet and jms packages.
> >
> > I've checked in these changes under the j2ee directory rather than the
> > j2ee12 dir because I didn't want to end up with three different versions
> > of these packages. The old jms and servlet packages still need to be
> > deleted from the core directory but I thought I'd make sure everyone
> > agrees that these are now dead and need to be buried.
> 

Are the src/core/com/mockobjects ones dead as this seems to be the first
stage moving the objects out of core in to j2ee (as a starting point).
The other thing is the jdk packages. Is moving these to a proper place
more important than the arrangement of the j2ee packages?

> We need to think about how we're going to do this. We can have a common
> directory for files that are shared across versions. If we don't have a
> versioned j2ee directory, how are we going to support 1.2 and 1.3 in
> parallel?
> 

Always a pain trying to do this. Do we actually need to support 1.2 at
the moment as it would simplify things to just start with 1.3 and worry
about 1.4 when it arrives?

> > I've also changed the build file so that it now compiles from the j2ee
> > dir rather than the core. There are still probably more changes to be
> > made to this especially when the j2ee gets seperated out into versioned
> > directories.
> 
> good, thanks. Maybe I should give up the branch and we can do it
> incrementally? That's supposed to be the XP way.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Jeff Martin

Memetic Engineer

http://www.custommonkey.org/