Re: [MO-java-dev] MockObjects License

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

I'm happy to be corrected. Any dissenting opinions? Otherwise, we'll change
the licence.

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Olaf Kock" <ok...@ab...>
To: "MockObjects" <moc...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [MO-java-dev] MockObjects License


> Hi all,
>
> I'll second LGPL. This means the library code itself is effectively
> GPLed, but may be used (linked) in closed source development and
> development of software licensed with any other license.
>
> see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#LGPL for the license text
> as well as more information.
>
> > So that's not as bad as the GPL.
>
> You'll also find an article by R. Stallman at that url in which he
> basically states that the LGPL is evil in most cases. I don't second
> that opinion, though ;-)
>
> Best,
>
> Olaf
>
> --
>
> abstrakt gmbh
> Behringstrasse 16b
> 22765 Hamburg
> Tel: +49-40-39804630
> Fax: +49-40-39804639
> http://www.abstrakt.de/
>
> Wir sind umgezogen. Bitte beachten Sie
> die neue Adresse + Telefonnr.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev
>