From: Jeff M. <je...@mk...> - 2001-11-13 15:03:42
|
I've actually got some mock objects written against the 2.3 api, there not complete but they do add support for things like Filters As far as I can tell the 2.3 api is backwards compatible with the 2.1 version (think it's actually a requirement of the spec) so you don't need to versions. Although there could be reasons for it on grounds of causing less confusion although it is more work. On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 22:36, Vincent Massol wrote: > Do you mean that the mocks are not complete or that the mocked api is 2.1= ? > (I'm not sure about the version but that's my guess seen that you guys we= re > using vajava when you wrote it ... :) ). >=20 > I think we should have at least 2 packages : one for servlet api 2.2 and = one > for servlet api 2.3. >=20 > you doing it Steve ... :-) >=20 > Thanks > -Vincent >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...> > To: <moc...@li...> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:18 PM > Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] servlets library >=20 >=20 > > I think the current implementation of servlets is a bit out of date. > Anyone object to bringing it up to date? > > > > I think the new stuff is largely additive, so there shouldn't be a > backwards compatibility issue. > > > > Steve > > > > 2=A1rjzS,=B4'y=8DuS=B2q=AEz=B6=FE=B6=BA~z=FE=B6S=9Ds=A1rj >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list > Moc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev --=20 |