|
From: Tim M. <tim...@po...> - 2001-08-17 12:25:53
|
T7 is a task we need to make sure is treated properly! I dont believe in java doc - its an excuse to write bad code or a way of creating work for yourself (it is useful however if there is no source with your project but this doesnt affect us...) The better fix is to name things paoperly om to write better tests. Can this task just be to identify which classes need javadoc? My claim is that with T1-4 we shouldnt need any. tim Vincent Massol wrote: > From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...> > To: <moc...@li...> > Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] [Proposal] List of tasks for release 0.02 > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:14:15 +0100 > > Here is a list of tasks that I propose for Release 0.02. Can you please > state your agreement and others that would like to see. I'll wait for your > approval before entering them in the todo page : > > T1 - [doc] What are MockObjects? > T2 - [doc] Difference between MO and Stubs ? > T3 - [doc] Goal page that explains short term and long term goals of the > project > T4 - [doc] Coding conventions (in a "Developer" menu) > T5 - [doc] Features page > T6 - [doc] Release process page (in a "Developer" menu) > T7 - [code] add javadoc to all code where needed + add version number to > sources (@version @version@) + packages.html + overview.html > T8 - [code] Code aligned with coding conventions (and MO naming conventions > already present on the web site) > T9 - [build] finalized build process (still need to finalize directory > structure + manage examples + manage extensions) > > These are the "mnimum" set of task that is can we before the release 0.02. > > Tell me also if you wish to volunteer for a given task. There can be several > persons volunteering for the same task. > > I volunteer for T2, T4, T6, T9. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > _______________________________________________ > Mockobjects-java-users mailing list > Moc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-users > > |