Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] ant targets?

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...>
To: <moc...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 11:17 PM
Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] ant targets?


> At work, I've adopted a convention of making internal targets CamelCase
and external targets lower case, it seems to read quite well.

I would have preferred something like "_my_internal_target" for internal
targets and "my_external_target" for external ones, or
prefix internal targets with a word like "internal" (for example "my_target"
would give "internal_my_target"). I think the latter is the ones that would
read the best.

I've just reread the build.xml and noticed that I have used another
convention, which is, for any xxx target, to prepare all environment setup
(directory creation, copies of files, ...) in a "prepare-xxx" target.

Also, I tend to prefer to write "my.target" rather than "my-target" or
"my_target". We could homogeneize on this pattern if you like it.
So with the proposition above, that would give "_my..target" or
"internal.my.target"

However if you strongly prefer CamelCase, that's fine. Coding conventions
are always hard to decide .... :)

>
> What do you think?
>
> steve
-Vincent