Re: [MO-java-users] Re: [MO-java-dev] Cretion of the dynamic mocks for classes vs. interfaces

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

If we get to where we want to be, we should be able to provide ordered 
mocks with some sugar code. (promises, promises)

S.

chris cottee wrote:
> I think you are right to go down the route of the API since if we still 
> want to keep our OrderedMocks we will probably just hide the use of the 
> API inside our own OrderedMock class, allowing us the best of both worlds.