Re: [MO-java-users] Re: [MO-java-dev] Cretion of the dynamic mocks for classes vs. interfaces

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

eu wrote:
> I see. That is sounds reasonable. In other words you are going to add 
> chaining of expectations but not through invocation handler. Basically 
> expectation on to be called after some other expectation. I can imagine 
> something like that.
> 
>  exp1 = mock.expect( "method1", C.args(...));
>  exp2 = mock.expect( "method1", C.after( exp1, C.args(...)));
>  exp2 = mock.expect( "method1", C.after( exp2, C.args(...)));

exactly.

> PS: what about the 1.0 release? Is anybody know the answer yet?

no promises, but we might have a little time just before xmas.

S.