Re: [MO-java-users] Testing HttpServletRequest

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Sorry. These methods are currently called match[...].

Tony Obermeit wrote:
> Hmmm.  Now I'm a bit confused.  I've checked the methods in the Mock 
> object and I can't see any setup methods.  The idea of a setup method 
> rather than an expection, or as you put it, just get the thing working 
> and don't check the calls sounds great for the type of test I want.
> 
> Thanks
> 
>> The short answer is no, because that's the point of what you're testing.
>>   That said, you can use setup methods, rather than expectation, if you
>> just want to get the thing to work and don't want to check the calls. We
>> have some ideas about how to make things more flexible in the dynamic
>> mock world.
> 
> 

-- 
"A LISP programmer knows the value of everything but the cost of nothing.
  A C programmer knows the cost of everything but the value of nothing."
(Todd Proebsting)