From: Tim M. <tim...@po...> - 2002-10-21 23:59:18
|
Don't speak so soon - the one in eclipse is pretty poor... I had high hopes too until I used it this morning and it hardly did anything. That said - it probably doesn't belong in the mock objects build... I've also been experimenting with rebuilding the junit plugin with the MO assert methods built into it - if I can get used to this cvs stuff and how to submit things I'll see about getting them rolled into junit. Tim -----Original Message----- From: moc...@li... [mailto:moc...@li...]On Behalf Of Steve Freeman Sent: 21 October 2002 21:29 To: mockobjects users; MockObjects Subject: [MO-java-dev] SuiteBuilder? Is anyone still using SuiteBuilder to assemble JUnit tests? It strikes me that JUnit is much improved in this area and we could do away with it. Steve ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576298;k?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Mockobjects-java-dev mailing list Moc...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-dev --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 |