From: Oren G. <og...@me...> - 2002-09-02 16:01:31
|
The biggest problem with Mock Objects, is that it assumes that each tested method, receives the mockable object as a parameter. I know that designers believe that this is the right way to do stuff, but: 1. It is not always possible. 2. Sometimes you test old code. 3. This argument is questionable. If you are lucky, you were using a factory where you didn't implement your method as 'expected'. You EasyMock is a classic solution where a developer is using a factory, and I think such an example would be a great added value. If you don't think otherwise, I would be happy to supply you with some of my code. Thanks ______________________________ Oren Gross, Software Developer Mercury Interactive, APM - R&D +972-3-5399407, og...@me... <mailto:og...@me...> -----Original Message----- From: Tammo Freese [mailto:tam...@of...] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 5:54 PM To: Oren Gross Subject: Re: java.lang.Proxy Oren Gross wrote: > It works! Great! If you encounter any additional problems, please let me know. Greetings, - Tammo Freese |