Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] EasyMock vs. MockObjects

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucas Filz" <lu...@ha...>
To: <moc...@li...>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] EasyMock vs. MockObjects


> Hello Tammo, Steve, Vincent and everybody!
>
> Fine that you joined in the discussion! I agree with what you wrote.
> One question that came up is, if we could think of ways to get to some
> convergence in the usage of EasyMock and real mocks (be it generated
> /refactored or hand-crafted).
>
> First thing would be considering naming. Maybe defining and following
> some common naming conventions can help in a better understanding of a
> testcode utilizing mock-objects, regardless of the method involved.
>
> Any suggestions here?
>

I agree for naming conventions. The Mock Objects project has tried to
defined such a convention. It is available at
http://mockobjects.sourceforge.net/naming_conventions.html. We can accept
comments and modifications if need be to reach a consensus.

-Vincent