Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] EasyMock vs. MockObjects

[Lucas F. <lu...@ha...>]

> > Of course, convergence of the two (dynamic / static) in naming and usage would
> > be fine, as it would give me freedom using both in the same project. (I would
> > not dare now.)
> 
> why not?

Because I find the techniques too new in order to mix them. Here I think more of
the other programmers, unfamiliar with all that, who eventually will have to
work with the code, and keep it up to state. It could be too confusing at the
first glance, EasyMock and real mockObjects.
In this sense, I would now try to stick to one of the two techniques.
But this will change, as mock-test-programming becomes an industry-standard.
in some years.


> No. We tend to fix code as we touch it. If you want to get involved that would be great.

I'll talk to you later about that, Steve. No time these days.


	Lucas