From: Stephen or C. P. <csp...@ya...> - 2001-09-06 19:27:38
|
Hi, Here is an enhancement idea which would help me and maybe make the mockobjects framework more versatile. Instead of having the addExpected(key, value) method only available in the ExpectationMap class, could we have an addExpected(key, value) method also in the ExpectationList class, where two Lists are used for the key and value, respectively, instead of a Map (Also, perhaps the key and value nomenclature would need to be adjusted, like input and response)? This is driven by the situation where a test requires a mockObject that must return results for various inputs, whereby the inputs/results relationship is order-dependant. For example, the same input could be specified two times, and I might require a specific result on the 2nd occurance that is different from the 1st occurance of the input. Ideally I could express my idea best by putting some unit-tests together illustrating my issue. I fear this is a bit beyond me at present, but hope to get there eventually. comments? thanks Stephen Peterson __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com |