Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] Advanced Java Patterns For Rigorous Unit Testing DRAFT

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

Hey Steve, could you please repost your answer to Thomas's question to the
list as it seems you only answered to him in private and I would like to
participate in the discussion as it seems quite interesting ... :-)
Thanks
-Vincent

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Calivera" <ald...@ne...>
To: <moc...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Mockobjects-java-users] Advanced Java Patterns For Rigorous
Unit Testing DRAFT


> Steve
>
> "just a quick point to start with. Have you looked at a recent edition of
> the mock objects library? You might want to align some of your
terminology,
> in particular the distinction between a Verifiable and a Mock"
>
> I just looked at a recent edition and very good point. Essentially, you
can
> replace the MockObject interface in the article with com.mock.Verifiable.
To
> give you some context, much of the article comes from a policy file in a
> project I am working on that started before I read your article, thus the
> inconsistencies even though your article is cited. I shall align the
> terminology in the next draft of the article.
>
> Tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mockobjects-java-users mailing list
> Moc...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mockobjects-java-users
>