Re: [Mlterm-dev-en] Incorrect reaction to dead keys

[Martin H. <hor...@Fr...>]

MINAMI Hirokazu (2002-12-02 22:41 +0900):

> Would you apply following patch and seewhat happens when a dead key is
> pressed under the configuration?

> --- x_xic.c     14 May 2002 12:05:27 -0000      1.1
> +++ x_xic.c     2 Dec 2002 13:19:23 -0000
> @@ -482,6 +482,16 @@
>
>         if( ( len = XmbLookupString( win->xic->ic , event , seq , seq_len , keysym , &stat)) == 0)
>         {
> +               switch( stat){
> +               case XLookupNone :
> +                       kik_debug_printf( KIK_DEBUG_TAG "XLookupNone\n");
> +                       break;
> +               case XLookupKeySym:
> +                       kik_debug_printf( KIK_DEBUG_TAG "XLookupKeysym: %s\n", XKeysymToString(*keysym) );
> +                       break;
> +               default:
> +                       kik_debug_printf( KIK_DEBUG_TAG "this shouldn't happen\n");
> +               }
>                 return  0 ;
>         }

It writes e.g.:

DEBUG: [x_xic_get_str()]XLookupKeysym: dead_acute
DEBUG: [x_xic_get_str()]XLookupKeysym: Shift_L
DEBUG: [x_xic_get_str()]XLookupKeysym: dead_caron

Martin