From: Len S. <ra...@ab...> - 2002-12-09 17:38:35
|
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Bryan L. Fordham wrote: > Here's my idea on how to proceed with mixlet. Let me know of any > suggestions or problems with this. > > 0.5 - Where I think we stand now > 0.6 - Move some things around (basically create some pacakges) and write > an ant script to compile everything > 0.7 - All crypto should be internal (ie using classes from cryptix or > whatever) > 0.8 - Move off of using port 25 to send mail > 0.9 - Config and cleanup. Someone deploying mixlet should be able to > access a simple interface to configure it. > > From there proceed with bug fixes to 1.0 > > For 0.8 I think we could easily supply 3 ways to send the message: a > jsp, a php page, and a cgi. All could basically take the message and > pipe it to the local mix instance. > > On .9 milestone: One thing we may want to add into this is using > user-supplied keys (and stats?). I say maybe because I don't know what > all is involved in getting an applet to read local files. I would shift all those numbers down by one, and include in there an explicit milestone release for handling the key file problem. (There are a number of possible solutions, from user-supplied keys to a third-party remailer keyring CA. None of them are nice.) > I'd like to see all the mix stuff in a seperate library; Len wants this > release quickly (I think). So I'd like to make the move to a library a > goal for version 2. That would be the time to add typeIII support, I think. > > Anyway, that's how I see it. Looks good! |