From: Rick B. <ric...@gm...> - 2008-09-11 12:12:07
|
Also... is the PLM transmitting to both X10 and PLM devices on your house wiring? One hypothesis I have is that the PLM becomes "latched" switching between the X10 xmitter and the Insteon xmitter (although I don't have a schematic of the PLM nor its' firmware code). On occasion I've seen the ~"PLM extreamely busy" message precede the freeze... and I don't have a busy configuration at the moment, with only one insteon switch in the mix w/~5 X10 switches. Lastly, the one time I had (intrusive) software serial monitoring in place (my current sniffer config is non-intrusive), and experienced the freeze, the PLM was returning a stream of 0xFC (or 0xF<something>). I don't believe this stream appeared in the Insteon logging within MH. I'm in a much better position to capture what happens "on-the-wire" now... if I could only repro. Rick Troy Carpenter wrote: > Rick Bolen wrote: > >> I've been experiencing a similar situation for several weeks now. I >> currently have a serial sniffer in place waiting for this to recur, but >> so far, no dice. >> >> I have a TED energy monitor communicating on my house wiring, and it is >> relatively chatty. I'm wondering what, if any, contribution it makes to >> the issue. >> >> Are you running any other communication devices over your house wiring >> besides Insteon? Compact flourescents? Motors? Other things that >> generate hf hash? >> >> >> > I only have two devices that transmit X10 on the powerline other than > the Insteon PLM, and even those only transmit via manual interaction > either in the morning or before bedtime. > > >> I haven't tried detecting the condition and and attempting recovery. >> There is a plm_reset command, but I dont' know the proper syntax for >> its' use... and until I can repro at will, I don't think I can test it >> with confidence. >> >> >> > I may have to look at that command and see if it will recover the system > from this condition. Once it happens, no commands go out on the > powerline and it appears the system is dead for all intents an purposes, > especially when it appears the system doesn't respond to any of the > motion sensors. > > >> I also don't know the best way to avoid memory leaks cause I don't know >> how to best destroy the plm serial object during runtime to avoid leaks. >> >> Rick >> >> >> Troy Carpenter wrote: >> >> >>> I'm seeing the following message after about a day of MH running. >>> >>> WARN: No acknowledgement from PLM to last command requires forced abort of >>> current command. This may reflect a problem with your environment. >>> >>> When this happens, no traffic goes in or out of the PLM. >>> >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > ________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from this list, go to: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=1365 > > |