From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-07-24 13:13:11
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=2680487 By: chicares [450KB binary for tiny program] http://www.mingw.org/MinGWiki/index.php/executables%20large ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-03 12:22:41
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3131018 By: kolloffnikoff Hi... I know that this are debug information and standart libs, and I also know how to disable these(at least my IDE, DevC++ know ;) and it is no problem to strip the debug information away, but what's with the standard libaries, the parameter --nostdlibs should take care of these but the resulting exe don't even lose a byte. It is important for me to take care of the stdlibs myself because I'm trying to write a 64k into. Do you have any suggestions or links to visit to get that fixed?? Thanks a lot for any response.. cya kolf ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-03 13:15:51
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3131108 By: dessent Try building them with CFLAGS="-g0". ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-03 13:41:59
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3131152 By: earnie Do the pages in the MinGWiki under Why help? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-03 15:18:02
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3131341 By: kolloffnikoff All right...I'll give it a try, the "-g0"...I'll report tommorow And I've read the Wiki about the big size again, so I got another question, am I right when I think, I can't use pointers without RTTI or what feature exactly does the noRTTI parameter remove(you must know, I don't know much about all that LowLevel stuff, but I try to learn, but there is so many I have to do beside coding) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-05 13:02:56
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3135646 By: infidel You can still use pointers with -fno-rtti but you can't use the dynamic_cast<> operator, and I think you can't use C++ exception handling properly either. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-05 22:01:51
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3136614 By: aaronwl Exceptions will still work with -fno-rtti, unless you specify -fno-exceptions also. The other C++ feature that depends on RTTI is <typeinfo>, which also will not function with -fno-rtti. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.htm l>. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-05-09 06:58:18
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3140940 By: kolloffnikoff ok....the "-g0" parameter just takes away a few bytes, but better than nothing and typecasts and exeptions?? I don't even know what that is, just heard of it and seen in some source...I'm not that C++ guru...most time I just use classes for a better readability and the rest is pure C, but I'm fine with this mix... as long as I can use pointers everything is fine ;) ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=7134 |