From: Oliver S. <oli...@ut...> - 2004-04-06 17:42:43
|
Hello,=20 How reliable is libxml2 when built using mingw? The build of libxml2 = succeeds without complaints, but "make tests" produces a whole bunch of = garbage like =20 < <path d=3D"M476 465C476 465 455 450 451.5 442.5C451.5 442.5 478 472 = 478 476.5C4 < <path d=3D"M493 311C493 311 481 303 479.5 305C479.5 305 = 490 311.5 492.5 320C492 < <path d=3D"M501.5 391.5L484 379.5C484 379.5 = 503 396.5 503.5 400.5L501.5 391.5z" --- > Usage : d:\My Documents\MinGW = Home Dir\libxml2-2.6.8\xmllint.exe [options Unknown option --memory some = help check: http://xmlsoft.org/bugs.htmlk The example that comes with libxml2 (<rood-dir>/examples/gjobread.c) = seems to work fine. But the strange behavior of make tests makes me = wonder how much I can trust the library when built using mingw. Thanks for any input,=20 Oliver |
From: Greg C. <chi...@mi...> - 2004-04-06 18:21:59
|
"Oliver Schoenborn" <oli...@ut...> wrote: > How reliable is libxml2 when built using mingw? I've been using it in production for years. > "make tests" produces a whole bunch of garbage I guess I don't use any facility that fails those tests. Try submitting a report to the maintainer if no one else has yet reported these failures. |