From: Paul G. <pgarceau@at...> - 2003-02-21 23:39:03
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd@...>
> To: <mingw-dvlpr@...>
> Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 12:49
> Subject: [MinGW-dvlpr] New canned response for bug reports
> > I've just created a canned response titled ``Invalid bug report -
> > Bug report rejected''.
> > Bug reports without test cases or enough information to determine or
> > duplicate the problem should be marked ``Deleted'', ``Invalid'' and
> > given this canned response.
> > Earnie.
> I think that's a bit harsh. Deleting a bug report because of lack of
> info will educate some people but will just frustrate many newbies.
> What about a "Feedback needed" canned response?
I feel in agreement with Danny here. I am not necessarily a "newbie", and the reply
outlined originally in this email would definitely frustrate me.
"Feedback needed" or "More Info needed" or something of the sort noted would
definitely encourage the newbies and reduce the level of frustration for everyone...well, most