AW: [Mingw-users] CLOCKS_PER_SEC

[Kittenberger, A. <Axe...@da...>]

Well I quotet from the mingw headers :o) What I'm definitly allowed,=20

also I'm not aware into special restrictions MS may have put onto their
stuff, but I believe in general copyright does span over citation and
quotets in context less manners. I also may say "To be or not to be" and
do not harm any copyrights over FAUST in example....
=20
well but I'm a technican and I donnot want to even learn the very dirty
details into that stuff.
Just wanted to note that there is a difference witch is causing
problems.....

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Earnie Boyd [mailto:ear...@ya...]
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Januar 2001 15:18
An: Kittenberger, Axel
Cc: min...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Mingw-users] CLOCKS_PER_SEC


"Kittenberger, Axel" wrote:
>=20
> Hello
>=20
> in time.h of the mingw runtime
((mingw-runtime-0.4-20001121-src.tar.gz))
> CLOCKS_PER_SEC is defined following:
> #define CLOCKS_PER_SEC  1000.0
>=20
> In the MSVC headers CLOCKS_PER_SEC is defined as interger 1000, also
in
> linux it was an integer (altough a larger one....)
>=20

Please, DON'T QUOTE FROM THE MSVC HEADERS.  You are breaking your EULA
when you do.  Find the reference on http://msdn.microsoft.com and
perhaps we'll get around to changing it.

> I donnot know how it is defined in standard or what it should be.... I
> just noticed the difference.
>=20

I can't say either.

Earnie.


_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com