From: Eli Z. <el...@gn...> - 2013-03-17 20:40:24
|
> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:30:10 -0600 > From: "John E. / TDM" <td...@td...> > > The good news is, GCC's steering committee and the FSF seem to agree > with us, and GCC's runtime libraries are licensed with an additional > exception clause to the GPL. The bad news is, I am not a lawyer and the > wordings of the exception clause and its associated explanatory FAQ [1] > do not inspire confidence in distributing GCC runtime DLLs without > accompanying source code. That exception doesn't cover libgcc in DLL form. I know because I asked RMS and got a direct answer. |