From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2013-02-27 12:50:00
|
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:44 AM, waterlan wrote: > Earnie Boyd schreef op 2013-02-27 01:08: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Erwin Waterlander wrote: >>> >>> I don't understand what you are thinking about. Wherefore do you want >>> an >>> mingw64 subsystem? >>> >> >> I'm thinking about the possibilities of the MinGW project offering >> both 32bit versions and 64bit versions of software. So we'll offer >> mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc, etc and the end user experience in using >> mingw-get to do so. > > > But if you want to offer a mingw64-gcc then I assume it should also be > able to produce win64 programs. That is why I was thinking of mingw-w64. Yes, that will be correct. > Or do you only want to offer a mingw64-gcc that can only target win32? > That would be ridiculous. > Ideally you want to offer mingw32-gcc and mingw64-gcc that both can > produce 32 and 64 bit programs, just by using the -m32/-m64 switch. I think I prefer cross compilers but perhaps allow mingw64-gcc the ability to use -m32/-m64 regardless. -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd |