From: Dmitry S. <div...@gm...> - 2009-01-23 08:51:34
|
Great! Thanks for advices! Don't you think that this should be fixed in MinGW release (in future)? I believe that such behaviour is inconsistent and lead to such a stupid questions like my original. I would understood if MinGW (or GCC) do not provide any implementation (i.e. fail on compilation stage, for example) but providing it for -O2 only confuses me a lot. Thanks again! Dmitry |