From: Mark B. <mc...@ec...> - 2007-03-31 10:17:56
|
Keith MARSHALL wrote: >Mark Bourne wrote, quoting Mark Mohr: > > >>>I got the same thing when I installed it on Vista. >>> >>>So what I did to fix it was put /mingw/libexec/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5 >>>in my PATH variable in /etc/profile file. >>> >>> >>Thanks. That fixed it (barring in error in the parameters to main!) >>I don't remember doing that last time I installed MinGW, but that was >>over a year ago, so maybe I did... >> >> > >You should not need to do this, if everything is correctly installed. > >If you are sure everything *is* properly installed, then maybe this is >yet another Vista issue; (how do they get away with breaking backward >compatibility with every new release)? > >Vista is just too new, for us to certify it as a supported platform. >(I use GNU/Linux from choice, and Win2K from necessity; I fervently >hope that I *never* have to move to *any* newer M$ release). > I appreciate it may be a while before Vista is properly supported, and I'd also have preferred to stick with Win2k for a bit longer. Problem is my existing machine is dying and the only options now are XP and Vista. Since I have always disliked XP, I installed Vista on my old machine to see if I like it any better than XP, and check that the software I use actually works on it. As it is, I actually haven't found Vista too bad, though given the choice I'd wait a few more months for compatibility problems to be sorted. >Please >raise a bug report for this, on the project bug tracker, so we don't >forget about it; it is unlikely to be fixed until Vista becomes more >prevalent among our developer community. > > It seems that Danny has already patched gcc and collect2 for this problem (Rob pointed me at a recent thread titled "environment hosed during upgrade"). Do you still want a bug report raised as a reminder to check these (and possibly other tools for the same problem)? Mark. |