From: Giovanni B. <ra...@de...> - 2007-03-22 00:02:08
|
On 21/03/2007 16.52, td...@td... wrote: > Greetings from the publisher of the infamous GCC 4.1.2 binaries being > discussed. I must say it's rather exciting to see my little experiment > already being picked up and redisseminated -- and disconcerting to see > my page near the top of a Google search for "gcc 4.1.2". Hello John, and many thanks for your binaries. I deeply appreciated them! :) In fact, your webpage was missing your e-mail address and I couldn't find it. Otherwise, I would have personally contacted you a few days ago already! > With 1.5 GB of my hosting plan's 2 GB bandwidth limit sucked up at > barely halfway through the month of March, my build of GCC 4.1.2 has > become much more popular than I expected. I'm quite delighted, > therefore, that there is an alternative download option that may well > be more exposed and is more user-friendly. Giovanni, if there is > anything I can do from my end that would be helpful to you in offering > your GCC package, I would be happy to do it. Luckily, I don't have too serious bandwidth problems. In fact, I have just added another fast mirror for my installer. And by the way, I can offer this mirror for your release if you wanted to: I thought that my installer was a strict superset of your .7z, so it wasn't necessary. Anyway, it looks like there will be an official GCC 4.2.0 release for MinGW pretty soon, so all these discussion will hopefully be moot :) -- Giovanni Bajo |