From: John V. <ja...@gm...> - 2007-02-23 07:36:21
|
On 2/23/07, Brian Elmegaard <be...@me...> wrote: > "John Vandenberg" <ja...@gm...> > writes: > > > Have you asked the gnumex mailing list? > > Yes, I have an ongoing discussion. However, the idea actually is to > avoid using gnumex :-) > > > They may already have provided patches to the dlltool maintainers ( > > binutils ). > > So it is binutils and not mingw that has a problem? I thought dlltool > was windows specific and thus part of mingw. Well ... nobody really has a problem; you could continue to use mexdlltool even tho it makes you itchy :-) mingw.org redistributes lots of programs that are maintained by other projects; MinGW is comprised of the projects gcc, binutils, and gnu make. That said, this list is as good a place as any to be discussing this at the moment, as there are a few folk on this list who are involved in those other projects. dlltool also works on linux and other platforms; dlltool's purpose is too merely know about the dll format, so as a result of being written in a cross platform way, it works on any operating system. And as a result projects like Wine and ReactOS are able to do crazy/amazing things. > > ... MinGW dlltool is missing the "-E" option that mexdlltool has. Are > > you using that flag with mexdlltool ? > > Yes I do. Is this missing feature a bug in dlltool in binutils? In > that case I will just wait a while. I dont see -E as an available option in my copies of dlltool on any platform, and the gnumex CVS repository holds a (reverse) diff that introduces -E and a few other options into the gnumex version of dlltool. http://gnumex.cvs.sourceforge.net/gnumex/gnumex/src/dlltool.c.diff?revision=1.1.1.1&view=markup It is possible that they have submitted this patch to binutils, but you might be waiting a while, as the patch may have been rejected for any of a multitude of reasons. Best to ask the gnumex list about the status of that patch. -- John |