From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2007-11-08 12:46:31
|
Quoting Kai Tietz <Kai...@on...>: > In my aim, the mingw-w64 project is not a second mingw runtime. I am still > in hope that we could merge (and review it together) into the offical > mingw branch. > The only correct way to accomplish that is to supply appropriate patches to the official MinGW patch queue. If you wish to start a SF project named "Windows Revealed" that provides documentation on the API it would be a real benefit for all of those submitting patches. Those involved with the documentation project would not be allowed to submit patches to MinGW because of the tainting that would be necessary to fully document it. The documentation cannot be a copy of the PSDK but could state the PSDK values in terms of a formalized sentence structure. I am tired of MSDN removing documentation and this could help resolve the missing pieces. Earnie |