From: Keith M. <kei...@us...> - 2007-04-22 22:45:06
|
On Sunday 22 April 2007 22:54, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > On the subject of RXVT, Brian Dessent recently suggested on > > MinGW-MSYS, that the default MSYS startup mode should be made > > `--norxvt', to avoid recurring questions relating to pty problems. > > Maybe the installer could ask before creating the shortcut? Yes, that would be an option. An alternative would be to create two=20 shortcuts, one for each mode. A possible problem with asking, is that the newbie doesn't know=20 beforehand, what problems lie in wait, if RXVT is chosen. > > I asked for a vote on this, and while only a handful of users cared > > enough to reply, those who did were unanimously of this same > > opinion. I think we should address this, for the upcoming release. > > I don't remember if I answered, I don't believe you did: the question was asked on MinGW-MSYS, after you=20 had curtailed delivery from that list. > I would have been against it=20 > probably. =A0 But I know how to modify the shortcut to give a different > response. =A0I give the RXVT term in my MSYS.BAT a value of xterm and > all is well with me. OTOH, I have found RXVT to be quite unusable. Building `groff' hangs at=20 about 80% complete. Running `nroff' interactively, the input stream=20 cannot be terminated, unless it's invoked as `cat | nroff [option...]'. The suggestion was prompted by another round of enquiries about the old=20 chestnut: `Where did my terminal output go? Why do I have to hit the=20 <enter> key to see prompts? After I've done this, why don't I get to=20 type the response?' Of course, us old hands know what's going on here,=20 but it is horribly confusing for the newcomer. Yes, the standard native console *is* grossly ugly. This time around, I=20 gave an extended reply, describing how I set it up so that I get most=20 of the advantages of RXVT, without the headaches; (about the only thing=20 I lose is the ability to resize the window by dragging its frame). Regards, Keith. |