On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Jack Andrews <effbiae@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Earnie <earnie@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Note, you are in violation of the license unless that 76.9 M package
> also contains the source of each binary file which I find unlikely.

aren't there are a few examples of other GPL bundles that don't
include the source?

You need to give a link pointing to the GPL source code that you used and  the user can download.