[Mindwrapper] Re: issue list

[Toni B. <ton...@sw...>]

> Yes, it may be overkill, but even when I was doing ALL of the
> development myself for months, using an issue tracker, as crude as
> it may have been, was helpful. We shall see.

I do think personal issue tracker are essential. But for that
is my whiteboard or a textfile. What I meant with overkill is
to use a webbased tool. Since I think it is much more cumbersome.
Even if we would start to use rebound or some other tool, I would
mainly use my whitheboard or textfiel for my daily work.
The main advantage with a central issue tracker I think is that
you can keep track of who is responsible of an issue. Not a problem
if you are 2 persons. Also that you can assign an issue to somebody
else and you have automatic mail going out. And so on.
But i feel that all of those advantages are not a problem if you
are 2 people as long as you have any personal tracker.

> > I also think that we the open issues we have right now is more to
> > decide if and what to implement. The implementation in itself
> > would be quite quick i think.
>
> Yes, most of the open issues are fairly straightforward, but for
> the moment I would like to do the implementations: (1) so that I
> can run all of the regression tests against the changes, and (2) to
> add new unittests for the additions (and possibly (3) so I know
> what is going on.<grin>).

Ok, just inform me when you have implemented any of them
into cvs.

-- 
Toni Brkic  
ton...@sw...
Switchcore, Lund, Sweden