Re: [MindIO-devel] BrainBay software
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
jeremyjw
From: Jeremy W. <jjw...@ub...> - 2003-12-31 08:22:28
|
Ian Vincent wrote: > At 12:13 AM 12/31/2003 -0700, you wrote: > >> I downloaded Chris's BrainBay software and I've been playing with it >> a little. It looks pretty good. I want to look into it more before >> I decide anything, but I think I would rather spend my time >> contributing to BrainBay than starting a new project from scratch. >> There's no point in re-inventing the wheel. Isn't what we all want >> just a good open-source application for neurofeedback? > > > I was kind of thinking the same. Its up an running and there will be a > lot of interest in it. I would be interested to learn a bit about it > how it works internally. From what I've seen, it works similarly to our plans for MindIO. It uses the win32 api, though, which would be a disappointment to Linux users. It would take a lot of work to convert it, I think. It doesn't have the application independence (and language independence) we wanted for MindIO, but oh well... anyway, since it's GPL, anybody could borrow code for other applications. It would just be a little more work. > How difficult was it to install. ? It seemed to run fine after I unzipped it, but the scope and spectrum objects don't work. Maybe it just doesn't work with my video card. I didn't spend any time trying to solve it, though. Have you installed it? > So that means MindIO is on hold then.? That's fine by me, and it makes > total sense to do that. If nothing else it has given us a chance to > look at some of the issues and now we can see how Chris has handled > them. And who knows, some of the ideas we talked about might be useful > someday. I think we should put MindIO on hold. Some of the issues we discussed might even be relevent to BrainBay. It still needs a lot of work before it's complete. > If its all right with you, I would still like to use the MindIO site > for my graphics, since I don't have access to the OpenEEG site atm. Sure. |