Re: [Mged-mage-perl] [Mged-mage] MAGEstk v1.1 improvements

[Jason S. <jas...@gm...>]

Hey Tim,

On 9/12/06, Tim Rayner <ra...@eb...> wrote:

> I think I understand, although I don't quite see the point regarding the
> MANIFEST file - the suggestion above works with the current MANIFEST,
> which is otherwise broken at the moment (try 'make distcheck' on a freshly
> checked-out tree).

Thanks for catching that - I'll fix it...

> Or have I misunderstood completely, such that you're planning to package
> these two modules for separate download and installation as well?
>

Yes, that is my intent - two seperate modules distributed independently.

The auto-generated stuff will not often be updated, but the hand-coded
bits may be updated much more frequently.

>From a maintenance perspective, I think this is much simpler.

Cheers, jas.