I'm right now starting to write my diploma thesis, for which I need some Class and Object diagrams and a whole bunch of Activity diagrams.
I guess I'd be fine with the MetaUML Class diagrams, and I could use them to create Object diagrams. Unfortunately there are some features in Activities which I rely heavily on, and they are not supported yet...
a) Activities have 2 kinds of "end nodes", and I need the FlowFinalNode (the one with the cross in it)
b) I need support for Object flow between Actions.
c) In the long run, I need support for an Activity box and the possibility to equip it with ActivityParameterNodes, and maybe for exceptions.
If you need examples for what I mean, I provide some links and page numbers for your convenience:
The UML spec: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/05-07-04
FlowFinal: Page 403
Object flow: Page 404
Whole Activities: 311-314
If you would consider to add support for this stuff, I would be happy to assist you, e.g. by providing code examples.
There's just one thing: I'd need support for FlowFinal and Object flow at the end of May latest, since that's the time when I have to turn in my thesis.
Since I'd like to keep a high standard with graphics (and all Case tools I tried suck badly :-) ), I would really like to use MetaUML. Do you think it's realistic?
Hope to hear from you,
Thanks for the effort you put into this clear feature request.
After a quick look, I think that FlowFinal can be implemented rather quickly. Also, ObjectFlow is feasible to implement - as far as I can tell now it's only partially supported.
As for pages 311-314, we'll talk about them after the first two items are completed.
I'll try to make these available in a new release by the end of the month. I'm looking forward to working with you.
Log in to post a comment.
Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:
You seem to have CSS turned off.
Please don't fill out this field.