From: <li...@th...> - 2001-06-07 19:41:09
|
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:50:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > I'm not going to put a lot of effort into explaining this but here's > the story. > > Mesa's used the convention libGL.so.1.2.xxyyzz for some years now. > The "1.2" indicates the library implements the OpenGL 1.2 API. > Anything else there would be VERY confusing for end users at this > point. > > The last part "xxyyzz" is usually something like 030402 to indicate > Mesa version 3.4.2. With this convention, people can look at their > libGL.so.1.2.xxyyzz file and determine which version of Mesa they're > using. It also allows various versions of libGL.so.1.2.* to coexist. > This very useful for the developers so we may easily switch between > versions when doing regression testing. So the 1.2 is "static"? Have you looked at -release? I don't know what this will do to the SONAME though. It won't give you the name above but close enough (libGL-1.2.xxyyzz.so). -- albert chin (ch...@th...) |