From: Keith W. <ke...@va...> - 2001-02-16 18:15:17
|
Brian Paul wrote: > > Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > > Brian Paul wrote: > > > I think the sources for Mesa 3.5 are quickly settling down and I don't > > > think there will be any big changes anymore (Keith?). If that's the > > > case, do you still want to make a seperate sources file? > > > > I removed a file 't_vb_materials.c' yesterday. > > t_vb_materials.c or t_vb_material.c? > > _tnl_update_material_stage is referenced in FX/fxdd.c and is in > t_vb_material.c. I added it to the makefile and added an extern > declaration for _tnl_update_material_stage to t_pipeline.h to make > everything compile. > > All the conformance tests pass now. I'm still seeing an error in one of the seperate specular tests in mustpass.c; Previously this was segfaulting (due to the seperate-specular/texture stuff I've been fixing), which seems to be different to the results you were getting (you sent me a list of failures that I couldn't reach because of the segfault). Can you recheck and see if you also get the specular failure? I'm running at 16bpp on my laptop. Keith |