From: Gareth H. <ga...@va...> - 2001-02-15 02:49:36
|
Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > I'd pretty much like to work on any of the above. I might be > > particularly useful on the templates, having working copies for 3.4 > > myself. I'd also like to port at least one driver to 3.5 (r128 and mga > > are good candidates here). > > You can have either or both of them... I'll take both. > > Here's my Nice list: > > > > - General work on driver begin/end objects. > > - Code generation for begin/end objects. > > - Asm-optimized clipping, lighting code. > > > > And after that (Really Nice? Not As Nice?): > > > > - General work (like the old fastpath) to accelerate driver > > rendering paths. > > All this is good stuff but I think we can finalize 3.5 and do this afterwards > as seperate work. (I'm not trying to push this back, just pull forwards the > 3.5 release). Using my list, I think a 3.5 release could occur after the > 'crucial' and before the 'nice'... Sorry, I should have made that clearer. This is what I meant, I just wanted to let you guys know what I will be working on in the future. After 3.5 goes out, that is... > The current code matches or beats the old fastpath, but for different > reasons. So yes, path improvements are possible. Exactly. I'd like to profile the new code and work out nifty ways to make it run faster. No matter what, it will be a good chance to really learn the new code. > > If you haven't started the tnl module swapping stuff, that might be a > > good thing for me to work on in the short term. > > I haven't. I've got a basic design I'll try and detail in a followup email. Okay, cool. -- Gareth |