From: Gareth H. <ga...@va...> - 2001-01-17 11:30:00
|
Brian Paul wrote: > > > > But Mesa's GLU tessellator and NURBS code isn't nearly as good as the > > > SI code. > > > > Can you be more specific? As a matter of fact, I am studying closely > > the codes of mesa's glu for personal interests. SGI's codes are not > > meant for easy human reading. > > Mesa's polygon tessellator doesn't have the GLU 1.2 features. > Gareth Hughes worked on this for a while but didn't have time to > complete the work. I'm sure he'd agree that it's a big job. > Also Mesa's GLU NURBS tessellator doesn't handle trimming or a > few other features. *shudder* Oh yes, it's a large problem. Thankfully, I actually understand it now and could do a much better job of updating Mesa's GLU than the previous attempt. However, with the SI code publicly available, there isn't as much of a need for this to be done. I've got a lot of other things to work on, so this would be near the bottom of my TODO list (if it were on there at all). -- Gareth |