From: Stephen J B. <sj...@li...> - 2000-07-03 13:46:24
|
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Daniel Vogel wrote: > Allen Akin wrote: > > > > I guess the bottom line is that the implementation *is* free to > > generate errors under conditions not mandated by the spec, but it > > would be dangerous for apps to depend on it. A nice compromise is to > > I was actually thinking the other way round - the app depending on no > errors to be generated ;-) I agree that a LEGAL program should be able to depend on no errors being generated - but passing NULL to glReadPixels isn't legal - so your program has a bug in it - and hence is not able to rely on *anything*. Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: sj...@li... http://www.link.com Home: sjb...@ai... http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1 |