From: James A. T. <tr...@de...> - 2000-06-29 04:42:25
|
While the license has some interesting points, that will inspire strong opinions from many directions, I believe that the issue of compatibility with the DFSG comes down to section 2.3. Here's my quick take on what SGI is trying to accomplish. They want to allow free use of the software, but in software form only; don't try translating one of the algorithms for use in hardware. They also want free use of any patents that a user holds on algorithms used in the software. Pretty slick -- A company notices that the code uses an algorithm they have patented, but only after executing the code. They can't sue because by using the software they have given SGI free use of their patent. Would it hold up in court? I have no idea. They also allow the software to be redistributed under a different license. The issues are sufficiently muddled that it probably isn't worth attempting. In addition to deciding whether the license is compatable with the DFSG, it is also important that it be compatable with the current license used by mesa. Luckily, this second issue doesn't appear to be a problem. Since Debian has a number of people who have experience with licenses and are sufficiently demented^H^H^H^H^H^Hinterested to spend some time on this issue, I'll forward this to debian-legal and see what they have to say on the issue. -- James (Jay) Treacy tr...@de... |