From: Olivier M. <Oli...@cy...> - 2000-06-27 07:09:18
|
"James A. Treacy" wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Stephen J Baker wrote: > > > > Do you think that the more 'pure' Linux distro's like Debian would > > accept that? It would be bad if OpenGL applications couldn't rely on > > the existance of GLU for simple stuff like gluBuildMipMaps just > > because we don't have a perfect tessellator or whatever. > > > Could someone point me to the license for SGI's version? It's http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB (be careful the first postscript page seems corrupted, it created many gremlins on my printer, maybe the .doc version is better). > If the license does not comply with the Debian Free Software Guidelines > (DFSG for short)(*) then the GLU library would have to go in non-free. > > Just in case anyone is wondering, I am the Debian maintainer for mesa. > > (*)They are basically the same as the Open Source definition, since the > Open Source definition is based on the DFSG. See > http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines for details. Let us know if you think that this SGI license fits with Debian DFSG. Thanks, -Olivier |