From: Stephen J B. <sj...@li...> - 2000-06-26 20:53:51
|
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Brian Paul wrote: > Stephen J Baker wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Gareth Hughes wrote: > > > > > Okay, here's the deal, for the record: > > > > > > Brian and I have discussed this, and we have decided to replace Mesa's > > > GLU with the SI's one RSN. > > > > I was under the impression that SGI's not-quite-OpenSource license would > > be a problem here. > > I'm thinking that I'll simply drop Mesa's GLU and require people to > get SGI's GLU. It would be nice if someone made RPMs or other easily > installed images of SGI's GLU. Do you think that the more 'pure' Linux distro's like Debian would accept that? It would be bad if OpenGL applications couldn't rely on the existance of GLU for simple stuff like gluBuildMipMaps just because we don't have a perfect tessellator or whatever. Don't get me wrong though - I'd like to see SGI's SI GLU become "The One True GLU". Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: sj...@li... http://www.link.com Home: sjb...@ai... http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1 |