Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [PROPOSAL] configure.ac: Simplify LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED and introduce LIBDRM_INTEL_REQUIRED variable

[Sedat D. <sed...@go...>]

Unfortunately, this means to get rid of

$RADEON_CFLAGS
$RADEON_LDFLAGS

in other source files.

As I said I am no autotools expert, but if libdrm_intel does not need
any furher CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, why libdrm_radeon is different?
The benefit of "simplifying" would mean to have libdrm_{intel,radeon}
handled the same way in configure.ac.

I have sent a V2 of my proposals with really checking for
$LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED (keeping $RADEON_CFLAGS and $RADEON_LDFLAGS).

--
Sedat

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Luc Verhaegen <li...@sk...> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:16:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what do you think about this proposal?
>>
>> --
>> Sedat
>
> Makes _a_ _lot_ of sense.
>
> Luc Verhaegen.
>