From: Dave A. <ai...@gm...> - 2010-03-15 08:44:11
|
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Keith Whitwell <ke...@vm...> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:43 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Keith Whitwell <ke...@vm...> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:19 -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Keith Whitwell <ke...@vm...> wrote: >> >> > This leaves r300g as the only remaining user of >> >> > pipe_winsys/u_simple_screen - which means we can rename that code >> >> > r300_winsys and pull it into that driver... >> >> >> >> Dave had some code that "fixes" this, I think. I more or less agreed >> >> to stay out of it, but I might take a look if killing u_simple_screen >> >> is a priority. >> > >> > It's just a cleanup at this point, no urgency. >> >> I'll try and merge the easy bits of my branch to get drop u_simple_screen >> first. >> >> then worry about the cached mgr stuff. > > Sure, whenever it's convenient. Okay I've pushed the r300g winsys/screen interface update, feel free to kill u_simple_screen with fire. Dave. |