From: Daniel S. <da...@fo...> - 2010-03-11 15:38:23
|
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:02:46AM -0500, Zack Rusin wrote: > On Thursday 11 March 2010 02:58:49 Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > ]] Zack Rusin > > | BTW, replacing a mail client on the server with something that's not > > | compatible is not very social. > > > > Rather than assuming malice, you may assume that I was trying to fix > > something when I made that change. > > I was assuming that whoever did it was trying to do something, but the > reasoning behind the change doesn't change the result at all - we were not > informed of it and the commit messages broke. So as far as we are concerned > there really wouldn't be any difference between someone just deleting > /usr/bin/mail and you trying to fix something by replacing mail with something > else. The bottom line is that there's quite a few projects hosted on fdo, with > a lot of people depending on that setup and making changes to it without > communicating it very clearly it is bound to break something. > I don't want to make into a big deal, because it wasn't but a short email or > even an blog just saying "new /usr/bin/mail is coming in, make sure it doesn't > break your project" would avoid the whole problem. Shit happens. Ease up. |